Threatening ‘Tom Yum Kung’ for the second time

Even though many people say it is not a crisis But I think we are really past the word crisis or not.

Today what is happening is a financial crisis. which keeps coming

But what he warned about was a matter of concern.

However, one family of economists once stated that If you don’t do anything today that will increase your purchasing power. to make the economy circular The Tom Yum Kung crisis like in 1997 will return.

If we say this, we must quickly come back and reconsider. and people who see that it is not yet a crisis And if the country has a crisis in the next 2-3 years like Tom Yum Kung? You must not just criticize.

Ask for responsibility as well.

Therefore, today the government has made a clear statement to Parliament. and has already campaigned with the people The government should be given the opportunity to work, walk, and hold us accountable for our policies.

Therefore, I would like to leave this as a thought for everyone.

However, saying this is not going to cause anything to anyone. But it is another opinion that I would like everyone to consider. that will make the country beneficial and move forward…”

Did they even threaten each other with Tom Yum Kung?

If you think the country will face an economic crisis, hurry and give it away. What are you waiting for?

The government has full power. Why didn’t the loan decree be issued in these two days?

Come complain about looking for a spear, what amulet you’re looking for!

The more he talks, the more it contradicts what the government will do.

“Bhoomtham” can’t read or what? Fiscal and Financial Discipline Act 2018, just 2 sections can be concluded as to whether the government can issue a loan act or not.

Section 53 states that government borrowing other than what is provided in the law on public debt management. Let the Ministry of Finance do this. It must rely on the authority of the law that has been specifically enacted. and only in cases where it is necessary to act urgently and continuously to solve the country’s crisis problems without being able to set an annual budget in time

The law enacted under paragraph one Must specify the purpose of the loan. The duration of the loan Plans or projects that pay off the loan The amount of money allowed to be spent on the loan. and the government agency which is responsible for implementing the plan or project for which the loan is disbursed.

Money received from borrowing money The Ministry of Finance shall keep it for government agencies to disburse for expenditures according to plans. or projects as required by law without having to send them to the Treasury. Unless otherwise provided by law.

Section 57. Borrowing money under Section 53 and Section 56 may only be made for expenses according to the work plan. or projects that are economically or socially worthwhile and when the government agency that owns the plan or project is ready to carry out the plan or a project that will already be used to pay off that loan

Slowly read these 2 sections, it is already clear. that if the government will solve economic problems What must I do?

Importantly, don’t misinterpret the word “Economic Crisis” by personal imagination

“Bhumi Dhamma” really goes a long way.

If you know that in the next 2-3 years there will be a second Tom Yum Kung economic crisis. What the government has to do is borrow 500 billion baht and distribute it to the people in advance?

How did you think of it?

Instead of accelerating to strengthen the economy With investment from both the public and private sectors Go back and create an additional 500 billion in debt.

Won’t it be even more woeful?

Is this the government’s solution to economic problems?

I don’t know if “Bhoomtham” wants to overturn the policy of giving out digital wallets or not. To come out and express such a sloppy opinion

What is conveyed is “It is not urgently necessary” because the crisis will occur in the next 2-3 years, but it will be enacted into law. At the heart of the law it says Can be issued only for urgent needs.

It’s all contradictory.

If “Bhoomtham” still confirms that in the next 2-3 years the country will definitely face a second round of the Tom Yum Kung crisis, then we must add the time since the Pheu Thai Party launched its policy. Give away digital money Until today

It will turn out that the government knew in advance that the second round of Tom Yum Kung would occur 3-4 years in advance.

Will I be too good?

And it is the most unfortunate idea that the government asks for responsibility from those who criticize the government’s digital wallet policy.

This type of thinking clearly comes from the basis of totalitarian thinking.

Criticism of government policy Not just speaking or use your personal imagination Let’s decide whether we should or should not do it.

But it is a criticism based on economic figures and laws.

Bank of Thailand, NESDB, National Anti-Corruption Commission decree, did they warn the government out of jealousy like that?

If now or within this year there is a real economic crisis. The numbers must be clearly stated.

The government does not have enough time to enact laws.

Only the Royal Decree must be issued in a timely manner.

So who is waiting for a digital wallet? Look at it.

What the government claims With reality, it’s the opposite.

It’s like there’s some intention.

The law says that in cases of urgent necessity, an emergency decree must be issued. But the government has borrowed money to cope with the economic crisis that will occur in the next 2-3 years.

There are many ways for the government to prepare to cope if the Tom Yum Kung crisis really returns.

Good and wise government must keep the country and its people safe.

There is only a stupid and irresponsible government. That will create more debt without the country getting anything in return. Before the country entered an economic crisis

Or must another group be pitted against Section 157?