The Damco case and the one that caused the recusal of two magistrates, pending
[ad_1]
Monday, April 15, 2024, 11:08 p.m.
you need to be registered to access this functionality.
Miguel Ángel Ramírez has other pending cases, such as the so-called Damco case, and another for alleged tax fraud that led to the recusal of judges Emilio Moya and Carlos Vielba.
The Damco case was born after the complaint filed by the Las Palmas Provincial Prosecutor’s Office in which accuses the president of UD Las Palmas of six crimes against the Public Treasury and also to the politician Lucas Bravo from Laguna, as well as the businessmen Christian Cerpa and Noel Jammal, for having sold material to the Canarian Health Service (SCS) in 2020 and 2021 during the pandemic due to amount of 22.9 million eurosall of this supposedly articulating a framework to avoid paying what is due and without justifying the activity.
Prosecutor Evangelina Ríos puts the magnifying glass on the profits that those investigated received directly from the concessionaire of the contracts through emergency means, a sum that amounted to 9.4 million euros. The two tax crimes attributed to Ramírez consistAccording to the complaint, in having evaded paying taxes on those profits worth 1.45 million in 2020 and 1.54 million in 2021by not paying them as a natural person, via Personal Income Tax, but rather via Corporate Tax, through Tabaiba, after having taken advantage of the tax benefits of the Reserve for Investments in the Canary Islands.
In the other procedure referred to, the TSJC removed two magistrates from the Sixth Section of the Provincial Court of Las Palmas from hearing and resolving procedures that affect Ramírez, considering it proven that There is a manifest friendship between them.
This decision upheld the incident of recusal formulated by the Economic Crimes prosecutor, Evangelina Ríos, against the two members of the Sixth Section of the Court after issuing an order to close a case that investigated alleged frauds attributed – presumably – to Seguridad Integral Canaria ( SIC) between the years 2014 and 2016, with the argument that Ramírez was no longer the administrator of that company. This issue takes on great value in light of the ruling of the Court notified this Monday.
[ad_2]
Original Source Link
